Showing posts with label Modernism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Modernism. Show all posts

Helvetica and the New York City Subway System






Helvetica and the New York City Subway System

For years, the signs in the New York City subway system were a bewildering hodge-podge of lettering styles, sizes, shapes, materials, colors, and messages. The original mosaics (dating from as early as 1904), displaying a variety of serif and sans serif letters and decorative elements, were supplemented by signs in terracotta and cut stone. Over the years, enamel signs identifying stations and warning riders not to spit, smoke, or cross the tracks were added to the mix. Efforts to untangle this visual mess began in the mid-1960s, when the city transit authority hired the design firm Unimark International to create a clear and consistent sign system. We can see the results today in the white-on-black signs throughout the subway system, displaying station names, directions, and instructions in crisp Helvetica. This book tells the story of how typographic order triumphed over chaos.

The process didn’t go smoothly or quickly. At one point New York Times architecture writer Paul Goldberger declared that the signs were so confusing one almost wished that they weren’t there at all. Legend has it that Helvetica came in and vanquished the competition. Paul Shaw shows that it didn’t happen that way—that, in fact, for various reasons (expense, the limitations of the transit authority sign shop), the typeface overhaul of the 1960s began not with Helvetica but with its forebear, Standard (aka Akzidenz Grotesk). It wasn’t until the 1980s and 1990s that Helvetica became ubiquitous. Shaw describes the slow typographic changeover (supplementing his text with more than 250 images—photographs, sketches, type samples, and documents). He places this signage evolution in the context of the history of the New York City subway system, of 1960s transportation signage, of Unimark International, and of Helvetica itself.

About the Author
Paul Shaw, an award-winning graphic designer, typographer, and calligrapher in New York City, teaches at Parsons School of Design and the School of Visual Arts. He is the coauthor of Blackletter: Type and National Identity and writes about letter design in the blog Blue Pencil.

Available February 2011
11×9.5, 144 pp., 273 color illus.
$39.95/£29.95 (CLOTH)

Pre-order here

Wenger Furniture & the 1960 Presidential Debate

Kennedy-Nixon Debate, 1960
The New York Times has a slideshow and an article by design writer Phil Patton about the set design of past presidential debates. The first televised debate featured John F. Kennedy, Richard Nixon, and Hans Wegner’s PP 503 chairs. And that’s quite the dandy little desk in front of the moderator there.
In the first televised presidential debate, Kennedy looked fit and tan; Nixon, with his five-o’clock shadow, looked nervous and pasty. Both showed a command of the issues, but appearances mattered. So did the set and furniture.
The set was extremely spare. The candidates sat in Danish modern chairs conceived by Hans Wegner, the famous designer, and spoke from behind skeletal lecterns that resembled music stands and offered no place to hide.
“The whole set was extremely modern, and that gave a sense of faith in the future,” recalled Carl Magnusson, a furniture designer.
The ambiance might have helped Mr. Kennedy as much as his tan: he was billing himself as the candidate of the future.
The ground rules called for the candidates to answer questions while standing. John Kennedy’s advisers thought this would benefit him because Richard Nixon was suffering from a knee injury. When Mr. Nixon shifted his weight behind the music-stand-like lectern, he gave the impression that he was ill at ease.

Copied from The Mid-Century Modernist

Modernism At Risk

















The World Monuments Fund has worked for decades to save endangered architectural and cultural sites around the globe, from the earliest settlements to 20th-century architecture. In recent years, they have increasingly noted that modern buildings face the same physical threats as ancient structures, despite a mistaken view that modern materials are less fragile than those used in earlier times. In addition, 20th-century architecture often suffers from a lack of understanding of its historical significance.



The Modernism at Risk initiative represents extraordinary—yet threatened—20th-century sites that transcend specific definitions, and brings advocacy and education to the forefront. Here are a few of the structures that are currently a focus of Modernism at Risk. For more information on the initiative and these and other amazing architectural finds please visit their web site.



Salk Institute

VDL Research House II

Joan MirĂ³ Foundation

International Fairground at Tripoli

A. Conger Goodyear House

Helsinki-Malmi Airport

Russakov Club

Schindler Kings Road House and Studio



Source: Design Mind

Flickr Find: Berlin: 2


Originally uploaded by Cavo Kernich
I like this image because it reminds me of mid-century film. The composition and lighting are just spectacular.

Globus: Modern and Innovative





Globus is a compact personal mobile workstation that offers flexibility thanks to it's rotating chair, the pull out table top and castors. Closed, Globus will attract the most curious of spectators, and open, it reveals its’ real, creative function. Half of Globus is a comfortable swivel, seat, while the other half is a usable, adjustable table which can be used for a laptop or whatever the need may be. With hidden wheels to make Globus mobile, once opened up, the wheels are locked into place. Flexible and functional, Globus can be used in the office but also at home. A sophisticated work station demonstrating a truly appealing example of innovative design. Globus is available in a variety of shades and colors.

Designer: Michiel van der Kley
Manufacturer: Artifort & Gispen

Flickr Find: New York: The Whitney


Originally uploaded by hoodwinks
I love this image, its almost psychedelic or Sci-Fi. Its actually the ceiling lights at the Whitney Museum. Its wonderful, isn't it?